-
Website
http://www.volodymyrzablotskyy.com/ -
Original page
http://www.volodymyrzablotskyy.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
iPhone
1 comment · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
55 comments · 4 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
11 comments · 4 points
-
Michael Lankton
1 comment · 1 points
-
glenng
3 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
The niche sites seem to make more money with Adsense.
One key with SU is that first person to stumble really should write a review, otherwise it gets a little messed up and no one is listed as having discovered it.
This actually happened with one of my posts you stumbled the other day, and I have had almost no traffic to it at all - interesting to see it happen though.
If you don't want to write something yourself, just highlight some text before you hit the stumble button.
You were scarred? Did they have knives? Most stumblers aren't so violent as to actually disfigure people.
[Edited- link removed]
Dane
I look forward to see your statistics. I used to have a Digg widget here on this blog as well, but I was banned from Digg and will never support them again. I find that SumbleUpon users to be far more intelligent, all you need to do is to read the comments from Sumblers.
I really had bad experience with Digg- once even called them bunch of angry and arrogant teenagers.
I have also noticed that "Stumblers" are more likely to subscribe to your feed if they find your articles interesting. I can't prove it but I notice a slight increase of readership on my blog every time my posts get "stumbled".
That said though, you still have the same with Digg or Reddit, how to get that traffic to return and that comes down to making interesting informative articles such as what the owner here has done. Thats why they have two comments now from myself, whereas 99.9% of blogs I visit, I'm gone within seconds.
It's interesting, easy to read and get's the info across without any needless banter. It's quick to read being relatively short but with all the main points getting across. So there you have it, keep it as concise as possible but get the information you want to deliver in there. With that you will achieve 2 things; the reader will stay interested and that in turn will convert to a higher return rate in traffic, which at the end of the day is the whole point of the exercise in the first place.
I thought this was going to last because Andy Stumbled this post was well. However I also know the power of "thumb down" on Stumble ;). Just got one.
I just marked the negative review as not being useful, because it wasn't
Whilst this post is quite sort, there is useful information in it for people interested in this kind of content.
Personally, I don't like rejecting anything out of hand unless it something really nasty. What stumbleupon needs is the current thumbs up - Hey! Look at this guys, I like it! - The thumbs down - Nope! Sorry I don't like it (But that doesn't mean that the article is then buried - others may like it - in fact I don't agree that an article should be buried at all) plus an extra button - Ignore or 'Seen That' - OK! I've seen that like 20-30 times already, lay of a while ok?
That way others get to see a page even if it has been thumbed down and no special rating is given to a page either way. If a user then doesn't want to see the page again, they hit the ignore button and that user doesn't get to see it again. Simple enough to do really.
Anyway just my slant on it. Just because one person doesn't like something doesn't mean others will dislike it and vice versa. It needs the third option IMHO and that goes with all social bookmarking sites in a way. That third option though should only be user specific and not associated with the rating of an article in any way. I see that as being way more fair in operation.
hmm maybe an idea for starting up a new social bookmarking site with a different approach - a Fair one.
nb: No nicking my idea now lol ;)